Improve client routing logic
This commit is contained in:
parent
876fa31d58
commit
db9daaefaa
|
@ -47,23 +47,19 @@
|
||||||
// Handle no matching route
|
// Handle no matching route
|
||||||
$: {
|
$: {
|
||||||
if (dataLoaded && $routeStore.routerLoaded && !$routeStore.activeRoute) {
|
if (dataLoaded && $routeStore.routerLoaded && !$routeStore.activeRoute) {
|
||||||
if ($authStore) {
|
|
||||||
// There is a logged in user, so handle them
|
|
||||||
if ($screenStore.screens.length) {
|
if ($screenStore.screens.length) {
|
||||||
// Find the best route to push the user to initially
|
// If we have some available screens, find the best route to push the
|
||||||
const route = getBestRoute(
|
// user to initially
|
||||||
$authStore,
|
const route = getBestRoute($screenStore.screens)
|
||||||
$screenStore.screens,
|
|
||||||
$devToolsStore.role
|
|
||||||
)
|
|
||||||
permissionError = false
|
permissionError = false
|
||||||
routeStore.actions.navigate(route)
|
routeStore.actions.navigate(route)
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else if ($authStore) {
|
||||||
// No screens likely means the user has no permissions to view this app
|
// If the user is logged in but has no screens, they don't have
|
||||||
|
// permission to use the app
|
||||||
permissionError = true
|
permissionError = true
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
// The user is not logged in, redirect them to login
|
// If they have no screens and are not logged in, it probably means
|
||||||
|
// they should log in to gain access
|
||||||
const returnUrl = `${window.location.pathname}${window.location.hash}`
|
const returnUrl = `${window.location.pathname}${window.location.hash}`
|
||||||
CookieUtils.setCookie(Constants.Cookies.ReturnUrl, returnUrl)
|
CookieUtils.setCookie(Constants.Cookies.ReturnUrl, returnUrl)
|
||||||
window.location = "/builder/auth/login"
|
window.location = "/builder/auth/login"
|
||||||
|
@ -71,8 +67,8 @@
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
const getBestRoute = (user, screens) => {
|
// Assigns a rank to a potential screen route, preferring home screens
|
||||||
// Rank all screens, preferring all home screens
|
// and higher roles
|
||||||
const rankScreen = screen => {
|
const rankScreen = screen => {
|
||||||
const roleId = screen.routing.roleId
|
const roleId = screen.routing.roleId
|
||||||
let rank = RoleUtils.getRolePriority(roleId)
|
let rank = RoleUtils.getRolePriority(roleId)
|
||||||
|
@ -81,10 +77,17 @@
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
return rank
|
return rank
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Determines the best route to push the user to initially from a set of
|
||||||
|
// available screens
|
||||||
|
const getBestRoute = screens => {
|
||||||
|
// Enrich and rank all screens, preferring all home screens
|
||||||
const enrichedScreens = screens?.map(screen => ({
|
const enrichedScreens = screens?.map(screen => ({
|
||||||
...screen,
|
...screen,
|
||||||
rank: rankScreen(screen),
|
rank: rankScreen(screen),
|
||||||
}))
|
}))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Sort ranked screens
|
||||||
const rankedScreens = enrichedScreens?.sort((a, b) => {
|
const rankedScreens = enrichedScreens?.sort((a, b) => {
|
||||||
// First sort by rank
|
// First sort by rank
|
||||||
if (a.rank !== b.rank) {
|
if (a.rank !== b.rank) {
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue