Merge pull request #1203 from DiUS/reduce-tmr-time-drift
Make tmr.time() more resilient against RTC changing frequency
This commit is contained in:
commit
7b95711636
|
@ -68,11 +68,18 @@ typedef struct{
|
|||
}timer_struct_t;
|
||||
typedef timer_struct_t* timer_t;
|
||||
|
||||
//everybody just love unions! riiiiight?
|
||||
static union {
|
||||
uint64_t block;
|
||||
uint32_t part[2];
|
||||
} rtc_time;
|
||||
// The previous implementation extended the rtc counter to 64 bits, and then
|
||||
// applied rtc2sec with the current calibration value to that 64 bit value.
|
||||
// This means that *ALL* clock ticks since bootup are counted with the *current*
|
||||
// clock period. In extreme cases (long uptime, sudden temperature change), this
|
||||
// could result in tmr.time() going backwards....
|
||||
// This implementation instead applies rtc2usec to short time intervals only (the
|
||||
// longest being around 1 second), and then accumulates the resulting microseconds
|
||||
// in a 64 bit counter. That's guaranteed to be monotonic, and should be a lot closer
|
||||
// to representing an actual uptime.
|
||||
static uint32_t rtc_time_cali=0;
|
||||
static uint32_t last_rtc_time=0;
|
||||
static uint64_t last_rtc_time_us=0;
|
||||
|
||||
static sint32_t soft_watchdog = -1;
|
||||
static timer_struct_t alarm_timers[NUM_TMR];
|
||||
|
@ -248,28 +255,33 @@ static int tmr_wdclr( lua_State* L ){
|
|||
//it tells how many rtc clock ticks represent 1us.
|
||||
//the high 64 bits of the uint64_t multiplication
|
||||
//are unnedded (I did the math)
|
||||
static uint32_t rtc2sec(uint64_t rtc){
|
||||
uint64_t aku = system_rtc_clock_cali_proc();
|
||||
aku *= rtc;
|
||||
return (aku>>12)/1000000;
|
||||
static uint32_t rtc2usec(uint64_t rtc){
|
||||
return (rtc*rtc_time_cali)>>12;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//the following function workes, I just wrote it and didn't use it.
|
||||
/*static uint64_t sec2rtc(uint32_t sec){
|
||||
uint64_t aku = (1<<20)/system_rtc_clock_cali_proc();
|
||||
aku *= sec;
|
||||
return (aku>>8)*1000000;
|
||||
}*/
|
||||
// This returns the number of microseconds uptime. Note that it relies on the rtc clock,
|
||||
// which is notoriously temperature dependent
|
||||
inline static uint64_t rtc_timer_update(bool do_calibration){
|
||||
if (do_calibration || rtc_time_cali==0)
|
||||
rtc_time_cali=system_rtc_clock_cali_proc();
|
||||
|
||||
inline static void rtc_timer_update(){
|
||||
uint32_t current = system_get_rtc_time();
|
||||
if(rtc_time.part[0] > current) //overflow check
|
||||
rtc_time.part[1]++;
|
||||
rtc_time.part[0] = current;
|
||||
uint32_t since_last=current-last_rtc_time; // This will transparently deal with wraparound
|
||||
uint32_t us_since_last=rtc2usec(since_last);
|
||||
uint64_t now=last_rtc_time_us+us_since_last;
|
||||
|
||||
// Only update if at least 100ms has passed since we last updated.
|
||||
// This prevents the rounding errors in rtc2usec from accumulating
|
||||
if (us_since_last>=100000)
|
||||
{
|
||||
last_rtc_time=current;
|
||||
last_rtc_time_us=now;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return now;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void rtc_callback(void *arg){
|
||||
rtc_timer_update();
|
||||
rtc_timer_update(true);
|
||||
if(soft_watchdog > 0){
|
||||
soft_watchdog--;
|
||||
if(soft_watchdog == 0)
|
||||
|
@ -279,8 +291,8 @@ void rtc_callback(void *arg){
|
|||
|
||||
// Lua: tmr.time() , return rtc time in second
|
||||
static int tmr_time( lua_State* L ){
|
||||
rtc_timer_update();
|
||||
lua_pushinteger(L, rtc2sec(rtc_time.block));
|
||||
uint64_t us=rtc_timer_update(false);
|
||||
lua_pushinteger(L, us/1000000);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -318,7 +330,9 @@ int luaopen_tmr( lua_State *L ){
|
|||
alarm_timers[i].mode = TIMER_MODE_OFF;
|
||||
ets_timer_disarm(&alarm_timers[i].os);
|
||||
}
|
||||
rtc_time.block = 0;
|
||||
last_rtc_time=system_get_rtc_time(); // Right now is time 0
|
||||
last_rtc_time_us=0;
|
||||
|
||||
ets_timer_disarm(&rtc_timer);
|
||||
ets_timer_setfn(&rtc_timer, rtc_callback, NULL);
|
||||
ets_timer_arm_new(&rtc_timer, 1000, 1, 1);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue